OPORA has processed voting results published by the CEC, and particularly single-member districts where two or more candidates have the same surname (or even name and patronymic name) or similar surname, to know whether namesake candidates had influenced the rating. This dirty election technology has influenced the voting results only in two districts in 2014 Early Parliamentary elections – ED #216 (Kyiv city) and #68 (Zakarpattia oblast).
It should be mentioned that analyst of the Civil Network OPORA made an analysis of namesake candidates in Ukraine when the observation of Early parliamentary elections has started. However, it's impossible to legally prove that a namesake candidate is a part of technology. Besides that, it's obvious that some fair candidates with identical surnames do exist.
Thus, 33 pairs of namesake candidates participated in Parliamentary elections on 26 October 2014. They were nominated in districts #16, 33, 34, 35, 37, 47, 48, 66, 68, 74, 81, 90, 92, 93, 94, 102, 106, 121, 127, 133, 140, 141, 146, 147, 155, 157, 159, 168, 169, 170, 184, 191, 197, 202, 208, 210, 211, 212, 216, 217, and 223. Besides that, 8 "trios" of candidates with identical or similar surnames were nominated in single-member districts #102, 141 (two "trios"), 147, 197, 212, 217, and 223. In addition, one "quintet" was noticed in the district #68.
It should be mentioned that 13 candidates who had competitors with identical or similar surnames in single-member district are winning according to the results of vote count and, will probably get a seat in the Parliament.
Let's take a closer look at districts where namesake candidates received enough votes to get the second place, and try to understand whether candidates with identical or similar surnames had influenced the election results.
Thus, we need to calculate the correlation between the number of votes given for namesake candidates who received the largest support, and the results of a winner in a district (5th column of the table). Our next step will be the calculation of total number of votes given for namesake candidates, and its comparison with the result of the winner in the district (6th column in the table). This number goes with the number "+" if the total number of votes given for namesake candidates is higher than the result of winner in the district, and number "-" if namesake candidates don't have enough votes to get the first place.
Table 1. Comparison of the total number of votes given for namesake candidates who won in the district (including namesake candidates who took the second place)
ED |
namesake candidates (surname, name, patronymic name) subject of nomination |
% |
Votes FOR |
Difference between in a district |
Difference |
||
37 |
Mydryi Oleksii Oleksiiovych The Petro Poroshenko Block |
14.69% |
9,829 |
24.33% 16273 |
"-"22% 17711 |
||
Mydryi Oleksii Yevheniiovych, self-nominated |
2.33% |
1,562 |
|||||
47 |
Rybachuk Valentyn Leonidovych, self-nominated |
16.88% |
6,923 |
17.29% / 7091 |
"-" 13.88% / 13756 |
||
Rybachuk Anton Viktorovych, self-nominated |
2.02% |
832 |
|||||
Rybachuk Valentyna Mykolaivna, self-nominated |
1.39% |
574 |
|||||
68 |
Kovach Vasyl Illich, self-nominated |
18.81% |
16,973 |
2.77% / 2496 |
"+"0.81% / 745 |
||
Kovach Anton Mykhailovych, self-nominated |
0.89% |
803 |
|||||
Kovach Vasyl Vasyliovych, self-nominated |
1.59% |
1,435 |
|||||
Kovach Oleksandr Mykhailovych, self-nominated |
0.56% |
514 |
|||||
Kovach Laslo Heizovych, self-nominated |
0.54% |
489 |
|||||
102 |
Boiko Viktor Oleksiiovych (1961), self-nominated |
12.33% |
10,057 |
17.57% / 14318 |
"-" 15.29% / 12455 |
||
Boiko Viktor Oleksiiovych (1959), self-nominated |
1.42% |
1,160 |
|||||
Boiko Viktor Oleksandrovych (1949), self-nominated |
0.86% |
703 |
|||||
106 |
Ivonin Mykhailo Volodymyrovych, self-nominated |
13.49% |
3,522 |
29.52% / 7700 |
"-"22.92% / 5977 |
||
Ivonin Valentyn Rolandovych, The Strong Ukraine party of Serhii Tihipko |
6.60% |
1,723 |
|||||
127 |
Kinakh Anatolii Kyrylovych, self-nominated |
12.77% |
7,247 |
20.04% / 11574 |
"-" 18.29% / 4327 |
||
Kinash Aliona Anatoliivna, self-nominated |
1.75% |
993 |
|||||
129 |
Zhuk Mykola Vasyloivych, self-nominated |
21.62% |
12,294 |
18.01% / 10242 |
"-"13.45% / 7647 |
||
Zhuk Volodymyr Vasylovych self-nominated |
4.56% |
2,595 |
|||||
159 |
Lysenko Viktor Ivanovych, The All-Ukrainian Union Batkivshchyna political party |
8.04% |
6,181 |
53.8% / 41311 |
|||
Lysenko Serhii Volodymyrovych, self-nominated |
1.26% |
974 |
|||||
170 |
Rodzynskyi Anatolii Anatoliiovych, The Petro Poroshenko Block |
16.3% |
11,193 |
17.67% / 12096 |
"-"16.17 / 11063 |
||
Rodzinskyi Anatolii Rostyslavovych, self-nominated |
1.50% |
1,033 |
|||||
197 |
Datsenko Leonid Mykolaiovych, self-nominated |
29.51% |
21,075 |
4.65% / 3319 |
"-"0.51% / 356 |
||
Datsenko Ivan Vasyliovych, self-nominated |
2.20% |
1,577 |
|||||
Datsenko Oleh Vasyliovych, self-nominated |
1.94% |
1,386 |
|||||
216 |
Liapina Kseniia Mykhailivna, The People's Front political party |
23.63% |
19,224 |
0.83% / 673 |
"+"3.36% / 2739 |
||
Lapina Nataliia Oleksiivna, self-nominated |
4.19% |
3,412 |
|||||
217 |
Stolar Vadym Mykhailovych, self-nominated |
17.17% |
16,002 |
16.75% / 15443 |
"-"14.1 / 12965 |
||
Stoliar Vadym Anatoliiovych, self-nominated |
1.37% |
1,279 |
|||||
Stoliar Vadym Hryhorovych, self-nominated |
1.28% |
1,199 |
|||||
Thus, Liapina Kseniia Mykhailivna and Lapina Nataliia Oleksandrivna (ED #216, Kyiv city) received more votes than the winner if to take the total number of votes they both received. They received on 3.36% or 2739 votes more than the winner. We remind that Oleksandr Suprunenko with 19,897 votes (24.46%) is the winner in this district.
The "quintet" of candidates with surname Kovach (ED #68, Zakarpattia oblast) have smaller margin. Kovach Vasyl Illich (number two according to the results of vote count), Kovach Anton Mykhailovych, Kovach Vasyl Vasyliovych, Kovach Oleksandr Mykhailovych and Kovach Laslo Heizovych received on 0.81% or 745 votes more than the winner Robert Horvat.
The "trio" of candidate with surname Datsenko from district #197 (Cherkasy oblast) have the minimal margin with "-":Leonid Mykolaiovych (on the second place), Ivan Vasyliovych, Oleh Vasyliovych. The total number of votes receive by the candidates is 0.51% or 356 votes less than the winner Holub Vladyslav Volodymyrovych received.